My best guess:

C/Post: Bridges; Anselem

PF: Tyeron Lindsay

SF: Ingram; Rahim; Moncrieffe

SG: Oquendo; McBride; Holt

PG: Hill; Roberts

Of course you can roll out smaller lineups at PF and go larger with a third swing guard and move folks around.

Just a baseline asessment.

We prob need another PF type, and really a best player available. Maybe a PG?

Thoughts?

Dawes would be ideal. Deciding at 4pm today. Between us and Seton Hall. Seems most likely to be SH, but if we are the pick, we are a serviceable PF away from at least being a bubble type team next year. That would be crazy to think about a few weeks ago. I think a PG and PF are the right two. If we can get starting caliber type players/contributors in these two spots, we would really have something for the first time in forever.

Atowndawg said:

---

Dawes would be ideal. Deciding at 4pm today. Between us and Seton Hall. Seems most likely to be SH, but if we are the pick, we are a serviceable PF away from at least being a bubble type team next year. That would be crazy to think about a few weeks ago. I think a PG and PF are the right two. If we can get starting caliber type players/contributors in these two spots, we would really have something for the first time in forever.

---

Dawes chose Seton Hall, as expected.

Nostradawgus said:

---

My best guess:

C/Post: Bridges; Anselem

PF: Tyeron Lindsay

SF: Ingram; Rahim; Moncrieffe

SG: Oquendo; McBride; Holt

PG: Hill; Roberts

Of course you can roll out smaller lineups at PF and go larger with a third swing guard and move folks around.

Just a baseline asessment.

We prob need another PF type, and really a best player available. Maybe a PG?

Thoughts?

---

I believe Moncrieffe has played a fair amount of PF, but yeah, I think we need another PG and another PF type. I would excuse the failure to get either of those if we can get a proven scorer.