Where we stand position by position

853 Views | 3 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Monkdawg
Nostradawgus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My best guess:

C/Post: Bridges; Anselem

PF: Tyeron Lindsay

SF: Ingram; Rahim; Moncrieffe

SG: Oquendo; McBride; Holt

PG: Hill; Roberts

Of course you can roll out smaller lineups at PF and go larger with a third swing guard and move folks around.

Just a baseline asessment.

We prob need another PF type, and really a best player available. Maybe a PG?

Thoughts?
Atowndawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dawes would be ideal. Deciding at 4pm today. Between us and Seton Hall. Seems most likely to be SH, but if we are the pick, we are a serviceable PF away from at least being a bubble type team next year. That would be crazy to think about a few weeks ago. I think a PG and PF are the right two. If we can get starting caliber type players/contributors in these two spots, we would really have something for the first time in forever.
Monkdawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Atowndawg said:

Dawes would be ideal. Deciding at 4pm today. Between us and Seton Hall. Seems most likely to be SH, but if we are the pick, we are a serviceable PF away from at least being a bubble type team next year. That would be crazy to think about a few weeks ago. I think a PG and PF are the right two. If we can get starting caliber type players/contributors in these two spots, we would really have something for the first time in forever.
Dawes chose Seton Hall, as expected.
Monkdawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nostradawgus said:

My best guess:

C/Post: Bridges; Anselem

PF: Tyeron Lindsay

SF: Ingram; Rahim; Moncrieffe

SG: Oquendo; McBride; Holt

PG: Hill; Roberts

Of course you can roll out smaller lineups at PF and go larger with a third swing guard and move folks around.

Just a baseline asessment.

We prob need another PF type, and really a best player available. Maybe a PG?

Thoughts?
I believe Moncrieffe has played a fair amount of PF, but yeah, I think we need another PG and another PF type. I would excuse the failure to get either of those if we can get a proven scorer.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.