The answer you will get is something along the lines of its always been a thing but he's been scared to speak up.Bulldawg1 said:
shew, a lot of what is going on is not quite the same thing. Change the flag - doesn't bother me 1 way or the other. However, why did KH have no issue with the flag when he agreed to play at Miss State? Why is it now all of a sudden an issue to him? Has he, his parents, friends, group, etc ever raised an issue about it before?
You don't have to be a lawyer to know that the best way to stop the insanity is to stop caving to the demands of a very small minority.Bulldawg1 said:
true. Nevermind that he is from Mississippi, he/his family have paid taxes there, and that he could have played for any number of colleges in a different state whose flag is not found offensive.
Also, nevermind, that he wants to use the school he plays for as to get a State Government to change a decision. I mean, look, it's not so much the what or the why - it's the how and the repercussions of that. But, is it only about the flag? what is next? A player says "I'm not going to play unless (person x) is removed from office? Or person X is hired, or something else in the state is changed, etc, etc. CD - you are the lawyer, but aren't there better ways?
This is what I love.ahurst344 said:
I assume nothing offends you, correct? And you are in a position to decide what offends others?
Clearly if these kids were offended by the symbols they are fighting against now when they committed they wouldn't have committed. Whether they are truly offended or not is simply not for others to decide. They have a platform (given to them by us, the fans and alumni) and are choosing to use it.
I too am not a huge fan of "holding the school hostage," but how someone chooses to use their platform is for them to decide.
yearofthedawg said:
Dating myself here...
John Wooden had a no facial hair rule at UCLA. One season All American Bill Walton showed up sporting a red mustache and beard. Walton said that since there were no laws against it then he was within his rights to wear his hair any way he wanted. Wooden's response:
"Bill, I respect people that stand up for their beliefs. We're gonna miss you."
Not a single comment in this thread has advocated for that.Jerrodjones said:
Wow it's sad by the sound of alot of these comments this the reason the usa is at the point it is today. Why keep alive the name of horrible people and a flag that represents hate.
I just hope none of these really good people have gone to Europe and have any pictures with anything famous/well known.Trackdawg073 said:
I'm sympathetic to this argument, especially about the confederate stuff, but my question is where does it end? And what gives us the moral superiority to determine who in history was evil and who was good? In 200 years they will probably look back and think we were morally bankrupt. It has to end somewhere and while I think honoring the confederate leaders is probably wrong due to the fact they actually took up arms against this country, which I don't want to encourage,, at some point we need to just accept that our former leaders, faults and all, led us to where we are as a nation today, and if we can stand here on moral high ground and condemn the past, then some of that moral high ground is due to the foundation put in place by the leaders people are now rushing to condemn.
I specifically think of Thomas Jefferson, who is now being canceled. TJ was by no means perfect by today's standards, he owned slaves and lied and cheated his way through business. But he wrote the Declaration of Independence, which is the bedrock of civil rights and equality in this country, and we need to recognize that yes, he had his faults, but he also created a document that has driven us forward as a nation, and for that he should be honored. There are countless other leaders in our history who I could make the same argument for who are currently under fire from the mob.
You can literally read anything I've wrote and and for the 100 time, I don't care about the names on buildings or the statues. Been very consistent there.Jerrodjones said:
I dont have to say nothing for stars. If u feel people are going to far protesting about buildings and names that are still being glorified that's on you. I have seen u complain about these black athletes that are making stands for a couple of weeks. You is what you is bro.
Correct. Just heavily implied.Jerrodjones said:
Never called you a racist.
1) Care to add any context to that? It's patently not true and no way you could support that with anything I've posted.Jerrodjones said:
Lol no brother but I do feel you think black athletes need to shut up and entertain you.
Whatever man. You attempted to accuse me of a pretty heinous thing like a complete ******* on totally unfounded, made up in your mind stuff.Jerrodjones said:
Look I'm on here to talk about my Georgia Bulldogs but I love that these black and white athletes and young black and white Americans are together and try to tear each racist person name out the history books page by page and brick by brick.
Which again, no one in this thread is backing the battle flag.hecole74 said:
I'm not for canceling anyone but I will say my argument was about the confederate flag not the American one nor the Declaration of Independence. That flag has nothing to do with that founding document. The followers of that flag committed treason and shouldn't be celebrated with monuments on public property. If their ancestors want to celebrate them then they should do so on their homes and property.
Nothing I've posted has had to do with complaining about "black athletes." I've brought race into it zero times.Jerrodjones said:
U have a problem about everything being brought up look at everything that's been post and your replies your have a right to your opinion just like k. Hill